Skip to main content

Booktalk - The Secret of the Nagas

The Secret of the Nagas is the part two of the Shiva Trilogy and continues exactly where the first book The Immortals of Meluha stops.

The book begins with a small, but intense skirmish between the mysterious Naga warrior and the Shiva-Sati couple. The couple underestimate the Naga and end up injured. But what puzzles them is the apparent lack of viciousness on part of the Naga, who, although he had many chances to kill either of them, leaves Shiva and Sati alive with only minor wounds. From this point the story thrillingly unfolds further.

A lot of new characters are introduced, and identities and backgrounds of quite a few old characters are revealed - many of them quite shocking. But nothing is as shocking as the revelation on the very last page of the book!

Like in the first part, in this part too, Amish, through his protagonist, continues to raise the question - if something is apparently evil, is it actually evil? What is good and what is evil? Through Shiva's discussions with the Vasudev Pandits, Amish delves into this moral dilemma repeatedly, with each encounter taking it deeper.

What is apparently evil may have a background and many contributing factors that actually make it good. It is important since we frequently assume something to only be either black or white; but later learn, often through harsh experiences that nothing is absolutely so. Everyone and everything has a reason to exist and a role to play. They can be dealt with only as various shades of grey.

It is this constant discussion - what is good and evil? why must evil necessarily be a person? And so on, which give the book a meaning and an intensity, and make it more than just an ordinary, fast-paced, page turner.

As you read through the book, if you think you can predict the plot, you will be seriously mistaken. Amish has taken inspiration from many incidents recorded in our itihasa-puranas, but his ingenuity in using them in the story makes it an exciting and fresh read. In the light of his sticking to a great extent with the attributes of the original personalities of whom his characters are namesakes, this seems to be a daunting task, but Amish has accomplished it successfully.

The book does have its downturns. Too many people are "ridiculously muscled", as we are repeatedly told. Some areas also seem to slow down the pace a bit. Again, like in the first part, the book stops at a crucial scene and leaves the reader pining for the next part, a good auto-marketing gimmic - after all, the book has to sell at the end of the day.

Amish has set a standard in his first book and matches it in his second book. What is in store in the last book - The Oath of the Vayuputras, that he is yet to write?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Spiritual, but not religious...

The first time I came across the phrase "Spiritual, but not religious" was as an option for "Religion" when I signed up for Orkut. And I have found this phrase to be quite intriguing since then. As I started adding friends to my profile, I found many of them opting for this option. I doubt if they understood the meaning of this phrase properly. I am trying to understand this phrase too. Like jeans, pizza, coke, google, nuclear weapons, credit cards, gene modification, pollution, communism etc, this is an idea imported from the west. The two operating concepts here are "Religion" and "Spirituality" . And only if we understand what these two concepts really mean, can we understand the phrase "Spiritual, but not religious". When I think of religion these are what spring up in my mind - dogmas & doctrines, rituals & sacrifices, rules & restrictions, faiths & beliefs. These are considered as essential aspects of a rel

Questions

I ask a lot of questions. No, I change a lot of my statements to questions. Why? It induces people to respond. As a rule, questions beget more responses than statements. That way, I'm sure to elicit an answer - from myself or from someone else - most of the time. I naturally do ask a lot of questions - to myself. Even if it were intended to another person, I wait to ask. May be in the course of a talk or speech, my questions will be answered, instead of me jumping the gun. And many a time, I downplay my questions and don't ask them in public. I find it easier to approach someone and ask them questions face-to-face. This is also to create an opportunity to personally know someone. Asking questions crystallizes ideas or problems. It is then easier to express or execute the idea and find solutions to problems. Asking the right question, to the right person, at the right time is an art. It comes to a few people naturally; to a lot of others, with practice. So, if you need som

Are we honest?

These are protesting times. A large number of people have taken to the streets - I don't know the real numbers but I am being assured that there are thousands of people on the streets, taking long marches, holding candle-light vigils etc - protesting corruption. I have covered the movement and the ripples it is creating in my other blog. So, I am not going into those details again here. I have a few basic questions though (as usual). What is it that the people are protesting against, essentially? Yes, we know it is corruption, but corruption does not sustain itself. It is perpetrated by individuals. That raises the next question - who are the individuals that perpetrate corruption. Or to simply state - who are the corrupt individuals? Are only those who take bribes and get involved in scams corrupt and dishonest? What about those who pay to get driving licenses without attending the exams? What about those who encroach upon a few square feet next to their own properties an